#An inconvenient truth stream driver

'A lot of people have been criticizing the science in 'An Inconvenient Truth' but they've been dismissed as not credible or put forward by fronts for the oil industry,' said Joseph Bast, the president of the Heartland Institute, which has spent more than $700,000 in recent months to place ads challenging Gore to a debate on climate change.

There were a couple of cases where we feel the film wasn't quoted accurately.'Д¬limate change skeptics felt vindicated by the ruling. We've got peer review studies that back up those facts. His spokeswoman Kalee Kreider said that Gore was 'deeply gratified that the court upheld the fundamental thesis of the film' and 'affirmed it as a valid educational tool.'ДЄs for the errors, Kreider said, 'Of the thousands of facts, the judge seemingly only took issue with a handful. The ruling resurrected the heated debate over the film's arguments between Gore's supporters and climate change skeptics. How many more exist?'Дimmock criticized the British government's use of the film in schools, saying, 'It was about time someone got off their backside and say, 'Oh, you're wrong.'' Yet he admitted, 'I'm not an expert on global warming, then or now. 'I got finished watching the documentary and felt I had watched a science fiction film,' he told ABC News' Joseph J.

#An inconvenient truth stream driver

The claim was originally filed by truck driver Stewart Dimmock, whose two children have not yet seen the film. But he allowed the film to be shown on the condition that it is accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's 'one-sided' views, saying that the film's 'apocalyptic vision' was not an impartial analysis of climate change. High Court Judge Michael Burton said that the film is 'substantially founded upon scientific research and fact' but that the errors were made in 'the context of alarmism and exaggeration.'Д«urton found that screening the film in British secondary schools violated laws barring the promotion of partisan political views in the classroom. The ruling came on a challenge from a UK school official who did not want to show the film to students.